Penn Today Online

Related Links

Find a Cardiac Specialist:

-

Physicians

-

Surgeons

Make a Referral Online or call 1-800-789-PENN
Penn Cardiac Care
Patient Education Articles about the Heart
 

 


 Penn Today Online

Current Issue
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma
Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy for Follicular Neoplasm
Prosthetic Replacement for TMJ Degeneration
Nonsurgical Treatment of Desmoid Tumors
Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery
Physician Announcements
Archive of Articles
 
Subscribe to the Newsletter
Newsletter RSS Feed RSS feed
   

Home
Penn Today Online
Referral Directory
Physician Tools
Urgent Patient Transfer
Research
Upcoming CMEs

Destination Therapy: Alternative to Heart Transplant

July / August 2004

Penn Cardiac Care surgeons are utilizing mechanical ventricular assist devices (VAD) as destination therapy for patients with heart failure who are not eligible for heart transplant. Approved by the FDA in October 2003 for destination therapy, VADs are mechanical aids to heart function that help restore blood flow to the damaged heart.

Approximately 20 to 25 percent of people on the heart transplant recipient list die waiting for a heart each year. Over a decade ago, early trials of VAD demonstrated that these individuals could survive until the transplant was available by relying on a VAD. Even though this surgical procedure carries a 20 to 30 percent mortality, 60 to 70 percent of patients who utilize a device as a bridge to transplant would not have survived on their own long enough to obtain a transplant.

In the late 1990s, the success of the REMATCH (Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure) trial led to the consideration of using mechanical assist devices as destination therapy. REMATCH compared standard medical destination therapy with VAD destination therapy in patients who were not transplant candidates. The REMATCH trial clearly showed that survival and quality of life for patients on the device was much better than for patients on standard medical therapy.

Ineligible for Transplant
Regardless of the number of donor hearts available, many patients are not candidates for a heart transplant for a variety of reasons including cancer, personal reasons, blood clotting problems, debilitating health and more. To be eligible for destination therapy, patients must have a very high mortality (upwards of 75 percent in one year) and be ineligible for a heart transplant.

It is anticipated that these patients will not only live longer, but also experience improvement in their quality of life. “Our first patient was so short of breath that for the last few years he spent most of his time sitting around. Two months after receiving the device he was able to dance and play with his nieces and nephews,” says Rohinton J. Morris, MD, clinical associate professor of surgery and associate director of heart transplantation and the mechanical assist program in the Penn Transplant Center. “The results have been encouraging, but the long-term function of the device has not been studied. While there are many patients who wait for a heart transplant, there are few who have sustained two, three or four years.”

Improving Quality of Life
To date, the Thoratec™ HeartMate Left Ventricle Assist Device™ (LVAD) is the only FDA-approved device for destination therapy but experts expect more devices to be approved in the next two to three years. At Penn, cardiothoracic surgeons are investigating a totally implantable VAD, a small axial-flow pump (which may only require a tiny incision in the left chest), a totally artificial heart, and other LVADs. As of April 2004, two patients at Penn received the HeartMate for permanent assist and approximately 50 patients nationwide have received destination therapy.

“What’s exciting is the technology continues to improve. In the future, instead of receiving a heart transplant, patients may receive a device as an elective procedure before they start getting so sick,” explains Dr. Morris. “Right now this is an expensive proposition, but it can be even more costly to have a patient repeatedly admitted to the hospital for heart failure.”

An Accepted Treatment
Each year, approximately 400,000 people die of heart failure. It is estimated that 10 to 25 percent of these patients could have benefited from surgical interventions including:

  • the investigational girdling jacket to limit or reverse ventricular remodeling
  • high-risk valve repair surgery
  • heart transplant
  • destination therapy

The future for caring for patients with heart failure is a focus of intense research. In Europe, trials have found that patients who were awaiting a heart transplant and on a device for one or two years actually showed an improvement in heart function and had the device removed. “Although I don’t anticipate this will happen for the majority of patients, the device does allow the heart to rest and heal,” adds Dr. Morris. “For now, destination therapy is in the early stages of becoming an accepted treatment for patients with heart failure but the number of people obtaining this technology should grow rapidly.”

The Penn Transplant Center performs approximately 50 to 55 cardiac transplants yearly and is one of the top five busiest heart transplant centers in the United States. Penn’s one- and five-year survival rates are consistent with United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) and national norms.

 


Referring Physicians: To speak with a Penn physician or refer a patient, contact PennHealth through the secure online referral form or by calling
1-800-789-PENN (7366).

   
   

 

About UPHS   Contact Us   Site Map   Privacy Statement   Legal Disclaimer   Terms of Use

The University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA 800-789-PENN © 2008, The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania